SGX Stocks and Warrants

China – what to look out for in 2014

kimeng
Publish date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014, 09:35 AM
kimeng
0 5,634
Keeping track of stocks and warrants news

China indices have seen a rocky start to the year, with the China A50 futures dropping 4.9% this year and almost 9% over the last month. The fall began in early December, after investors were spooked by the rising inter-bank rates.
 
In a research report published on 23 December 2013, Macquarie Equities Research (MER) analysed the reason behind the soaring inter-bank rates and how things may pan out in 2014.

Why inter-bank rates soared again...and what does it tell us about 2014?
China’s inter-bank rates scared the market again. 7-day repo surged to 8.1% on 20 December 2013, the highest level since the credit crunch in June 2013. Largely on liquidity concerns, the A-share market dropped for nine consecutive trading days, the longest losing streak since 1994. Why did rates spike again? What is the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) thinking? Why has 2013 been such a turbulent year for the inter-bank market? Most importantly, what does it tell us about 2014?
 
Why a new round of credit crunch?
MER believes three drivers are behind the recent surge of SHIBOR (China’s interbank rates): Expectation (and realization) of Fed tapering; unfavourable seasonal factors; and the ambivalent attitude of the PBoC. The last point is particularly important, as the root cause of the two credit crunches this year largely lies in the central bank’s missteps in monetary policy and subsequent miscommunications with the market. That said, MER doesnt think a repeat of June is likely this time, as the PBoC has unlimited liquidity to supply and it has already started to do so. Looking into 2014, Fed tapering could escalate. Funding costs would rise more due to the ongoing financial reform. Last but not least, a clampdown on the fast-growing inter-bank assets by the regulators will likely happen. Putting them together, liquidity could continue to be the top concern for investors in 2014.
 
Driver 1: The expectation (and realization) of Fed tapering. On 18 December 2013, the Fed decided to wind down its monthly bond purchase program by US$10bn. Due to the continued improvement of US economic data, actually the expectation of tapering began to gain traction two weeks in early December. Back in May 2013, the expectation of Fed tapering caused a bloodbath in emerging markets. China’s banks must have taken notes from the not-so-remote incident. This time, with the expectation (and realization) of Fed tapering, Chinese institutions are anticipating a liquidity shortage and therefore hoarding cash immediately, which contributed to the surge of inter-bank rates in December 2013.
 
Driver 2: Unfavourable seasonal factors. First, liquidity demand will be higher toward quarter-ends, as banks tend to inflate their deposits to meet loan-to-deposit requirement. As a result, it will lead to higher reserve payments by banks to the PBoC and thereby higher cash demand. Second, actual fiscal spending in  December 2013, the month of fiscal spending sprees in the past, could fall short of expectations, given the new government’s emphasis on spending discipline.
 
Driver 3: The PBoC’s ambivalent attitude. Just like the credit crunch in June 2013, the PBoC’s ambivalent policy stance was the most important driver behind the recent rate spikes. In the two weeks prior to 23 December 2013, China’s central bank successfully surprised the market by refraining from injecting liquidity through reverse repo. After the rates surged, on 20 December 2013, the PBoC surprised the market again by announcing that it had injected over RMB300bn through short-term liquidity operation (SLO) in the past three days. Why is the PBoC so ambivalent on its policy stance? In MER’sview, it’s largely due to the three dilemmas faced by the PBoC : Deleveraging vs. stability; Inter-bank vs. real economy liquidity; Quantity vs. price rules.



Deleveraging versus stability. On one hand, the PBoC clearly believes deleveraging should be one of the top price priorities, as it mentioned the D-word for the first time in the 3Q14 monetary policy report. Since the interbank market has become a major funding source for the shadow banking sector, the PBoC desires to keep inter-bank rates at a relatively high level to enforce deleveraging. But nor does the PBoC want SHIBOR to be too high, which would jeopardize economic growth. In practice, the balancing point is hard to strike, and the ideal point will change as well with the internal and external economic environment.
 
- Inter-bank versus real economy liquidity. The PBoC seems to believe the liquidity condition for the real economy should be ample. First, FX purchases, a source of liquidity supply like reverse repo in open market operation, came in at RMB2.5 trillion in 11M13, compared with RMB360 billion in 2012. Second, fiscal spending, another source of liquidity supply as well, should be higher in December 2013 as well. Therefore, the PBoC’s initial intention might just to offset the increase of liquidity supply through open market operation. However, its open market operation is closely watched by banks as a major gauge of policy stance. In other words, the suspension of reverse repo could be easily misinterpreted by banks as a signal for monetary policy tightening. To make things worse, the PBoC often doesn’t give clear guidance on its intentions, causing the market to panic from time to time.


 - Quantity versus price rules. For central banks, it’s impossible to follow quantity and price rules simultaneously in conducting monetary policy. That’s why most central banks in the developed markets neglect quantitative measures (say, money supply growth) by focusing on price measures (say, overnight rates) as the main tool for monetary policy. However, for the PBoC, its policy is largely a mix of quantity (loan quota, money supply growth, etc) and price (SHIBOR, 1-year benchmark rate, etc). In practice, once the PBoC wants to slow down money supply growth by stopping reverse repo, it will be hard for it to prevent rates from spiking. If the PBoC wants to stabilize inter-bank rates through liquidity injection, it could easily lose its control of credit growth.

 2014: Liquidity will top market concerns
MER doesn’t think a repeat of June is likely this time, as the PBoC has almost unlimited liquidity to inject if needed. And China’s central bank definitely wants to avoid excess volatility in the market. However, liquidity will likely be the top concerns for the market in 2014.
 
-  On banks’ liability side: Funding costs are on an uptrend due to the rapid growth of deposit substitutes such as wealth management products (WMP) and money market funds (MMF). By offering higher yields, WMPs are increasingly substituting for time deposits and MMFs are for demand deposits.
 
- On banks’ asset side: Banks are increasingly turning its asset holdings from low-return assets such as bond to high-return assets such as inter-bank assets, many of which are essentially bank loans. These loans are disguised as inter-bank assets to bypass the loan quota. Such movement could push up the required returns in all asset classes.
 
 
Trading the volatile Chinese market via China A50 warrants
Investors who are keen to trade the volatile Chinese markets can do so via Macquarie’s China A50 warrants.
 
The China A50 warrants track the movement of the SGX China A50 futures. The FTSE A50 Index in turn tracks the performance of the 50 largest A-share companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchange. It includes mega-names like Ping An Insurance, China Merchants Bank and Shanghai Pudong Development Bank. The index gives investors a broad exposure to the China market.

Source: Macquarie Research - 16 Jan 2014

 

Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 0 of 0 comments

Post a Comment