ETFs are a great way to invest in stocks. Over the years, I've been buying the S&P 500 ETFs for my kids' portfolios.
But today, ETFs are likely to provide disappointing returns over the next decade.
Over the last 15 years, we sat in a global era of cheap money printing. The Fed was pumping money and interest rates fell to zero. There was a flood of cheap money, which lifted valuations of the biggest tech giants, including Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms.
It made sense to load up an S&P 500 ETF. Back then, ETFs were cheap. And a huge chunk of ETF returns came from a handful of these tech blue-chips. You made good money as the ETF's PE ratio kept growing.
Today, things are different.
Valuations are no longer cheap. Especially with higher interest rates, you can buy Singapore REITs, bonds and even cash between 3-6% yield. In fact, the current S&P 500 index PE ratio is ~30x.
John Bogle, the founder of the Vanguard Group, said ETF works because when you buy the entire market...
That first reason for buying ETFs is gone.
You'll already know the top 10 positions of US stocks account for at least 35% of the S&P 500 market cap. Buying into the index today is really buying into a concentrated handful of pricey tech stocks.
High valuations of these heavy large caps will mean lower returns at least over the next decade.
What's more, Vanguard also says passive investing will have a huge underperformance: “But if the Vanguard numbers look bad, consider this: Their model implies absolute catastrophe for those who invest in large U.S. growth stocks – the kind currently dominating the market. The firm sees a passive investment in U.S. growth losing somewhere between 20% and 40% of its value in real or constant dollars over the next 10 years. (That’s based on forecast nominal average returns of minus 0.4% a year to minus 1.6% a year, and their inflation estimates.)”
Vanguard builds its whole business on ETFs. It's the second largest ETF provider in the world.
When it says there's trouble with passive investing, I'd sit up and listen.
These companies have gushed enormous free cash flow - more than other businesses that have ever existed. However, my big problem is overpaying for businesses.
During the 1970s, the Nifty Fifties dominated index returns. People started picking up market darlings like blue-chips "for safety". Yet, these companies became so popular, shares were trading at "rich" valuations - Avon Products, Kodak, Xerox, Disney and even McDonald's at one point traded at sky high valuations.
These blue-chips that were regarded as solid buy and hold growth stocks... until they didn't.
Forbes Magazine wrote in 1977: “What held the Nifty Fifty up? The same thing that held up tulip-bulb prices in long-ago Holland - popular delusions and the madness of crowds. The delusion was that these companies were so good it didn’t matter what you paid for them; their inexorable growth would bail you out.”
ETFs that are overly concentrated in a handful of stocks are likely to produce disappointing returns at least over the next ten years.
I mean, look at past market cycles:
The more expensive an index is, the smarter you need to be.
The more expensive a stock is, the smarter you need to be.
This is because buying at rich valuations means you need to be able to predict the future well.
A Diligence member once asked me: "Willie, is it still worth buying TSMC at $220 per share?" That's a hard question to answer.
Members will know my Right Price Limit for TSMC is much lower.
At $220, you have to justify paying a lot more for the huge growth paying for. In other words, you've got to be more right than someone who's paying TSMC at $96 per share.
What's more, there's the ongoing trade war and higher interest rates. ETFs will just buy everything - the good, the bad and the lousy.
Instead, I'd rather focus on picking stocks that have just fallen out of favour to protect my portfolio. This also gives me a sufficient amount of margin of safety.
What I'm saying is this: I've no doubt some of the most prominent tech giants today will continue to produce enormous free cash flow.
But high valuations of these heavy large caps will mean lower returns going forward.
And are likely to produce disappointing returns at least over the next ten years.
Because, not all of the stocks should be bought at any price.
This is why I'm not buying ETFs today.
Sometimes, investing can be simple.
Willie Keng, CFA
Founder, Dividend Titan
The post Why I’m Not Buying ETFs appeared first on Dividend Titan.
1
SGX Market Dialogues
10 in 10 With OTS Holdings - Leading With Excellence in Food Manufacturing
2
Collin Seow Remisier Blog
3
4
Collin Seow Remisier Blog
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....